The Miami Herald
February 16, 2001

Embargo's impact slight, report says

Cuba's trade seen as limited by own politics

 BY KEN GUGGENHEIM
 Associated Press

 WASHINGTON -- U.S. sanctions on Cuba have cost Americans less than $1
 billion a year in exports and have had a similarly minimal impact on the
 communist island, according to the most comprehensive federal study ever of the
 embargo's impact.

 The International Trade Commission report, sent Thursday to the House Ways
 and Means Committee but not released publicly, could provide fodder to those on
 both sides of the debate over lifting the 39-year-old trade embargo. An executive
 summary was obtained by the Associated Press.

 Supporters of the embargo can say the report boosts their argument that U.S.
 businesses are losing relatively few trade opportunities because of the sanctions
 and that lifting the sanctions would do little to boost Cuba's weak economy and
 poor living conditions.

 ``U.S. economic sanctions with respect to Cuba generally had a minimal overall
 historical impact'' on the Cuban and U.S. economies, it said.

 Even without sanctions, Cuba's own policies would limit trade, the analysts said.

 ``Cuba . . . tends to select its trade and investment partners based on political
 considerations -- the desire to maintain economic ties with existing partners and
 to avoid becoming economically dependent on a single country -- rather than
 economic cost factors,'' the report said.

 But opponents can point to specific instances where the sanctions have cost the
 United States trade opportunities -- most notably rice, where U.S. export losses
 have been ``significant.''

 RICE IMPORTS

 The sanctions cost U.S. rice growers what had been their leading market from
 1955-58. Without sanctions, U.S. rice imports could have increased by 3 percent
 to 5 percent a year, the report said.

 And the study noted that an estimated 1 million U.S. tourists would visit Cuba
 each year if the sanctions were lifted -- which could benefit U.S. travel businesses
 that book the trips, along with the Cuban economy.

 Overall, the report estimates the United States would have gained $652 million to
 $990 million a year in exports if the sanctions had been lifted. Cuba would have
 gained $84 million to $167 million a year.

 In contrast, U.S. companies export more than four times that amount with the
 Dominican Republic, a smaller Caribbean country.

 EXILE REACTION

 ``I think the ITC basically established what we've been saying all along, which is
 that there's a minimal impact on U.S. business of the sanctions,'' said Dennis
 Hays, executive vice president of the Cuban-American National Foundation.

 The study by the independent, nonpartisan agency is believed to be the first
 objective attempt by the U.S. government to study the economic effects of
 sanctions imposed by President John F. Kennedy to pressure democratic
 changes in Fidel Castro's communist Cuba.

 Pressure has slowly grown in Congress to lift the sanctions, with some farm-state
 Republicans joining liberal Democrats in arguing that sanctions are ineffective and
 have hurt both Cubans and Americans. But President Bush has said he favors
 maintaining the sanctions.

 TOOK NO SIDES

 The study did not make a recommendation about whether the embargo should be
 continued.

 Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who last year unsuccessfully proposed easing the
 sanctions, plans to offer a similar proposal again this year.

 ``U.S. policy-makers need to take a long hard look at our policy -- one that is
 more than 10 years out of date,'' Baucus spokesman Michael Siegel said. ``It only
 serves to hurt the Cuban people and punish U.S. businesses and it should be
 repealed.''

 John Kavulich, president of the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council, said the
 study's conclusions on the embargo's impact can be viewed from different
 perspectives: from those who looking at the sanctions' effect on the two nations'
 economies and those who consider how individual businesses may be affected.

 ``For some it's not significant. For others it will be and they'll both have a
 legitimate point,'' he said.