The Washington Post
March 30, 1999
 
 
For U.S. and Cuba, It Was Just a Game
 
Baseball Fosters Goodwill, No Policy Gains

                  By Serge F. Kovaleski
                  Washington Post Foreign Service
                  Tuesday, March 30, 1999; Page A08

                  HAVANA, March 29—Officials here and in Washington
                  uncharacteristically agreed on something today: Sunday's historic baseball
                  game between the Baltimore Orioles and a team of Cuban all-stars
                  amounted to something decidedly less than a foreign policy breakthrough.

                  The president of Cuba's National Assembly, Ricardo Alarcon, told
                  reporters that the game demonstrated that people from both countries can
                  enjoy harmonious relations and develop cultural ties when four decades of
                  political hostilities are put aside.

                  Alarcon said the ballgame and a concert here Sunday night that featured
                  80 American and Cuban musicians "reflect the possibility that can exist
                  between two countries to have normal, fruitful, peaceful exchanges when
                  they are based on mutual respect for each other's sovereignty and
                  independence."

                  Sunday's game marked the first time that an American major league team
                  had played a Cuban squad since shortly after President Fidel Castro seized
                  power in 1959. The Cuban team is scheduled to travel to Baltimore in
                  May to meet the Orioles again.

                  Nevertheless, Alarcon -- who is Castro's chief negotiator with Washington
                  -- expressed skepticism about how much ties between this nation and its
                  powerful neighbor to the north could improve while the 37-year-old U.S.
                  trade embargo against Cuba remains in place.

                  "It is possible to have a normal relationship in one area while relations are
                  abnormal in general," he said. "It can happen, but experience shows it is
                  very difficult."

                  Alarcon said at a news conference here that Cuba is amenable to
                  broadening so-called people-to-people exchanges with the United States
                  -- provided Havana does not feel they are an attempt by Washington to
                  interfere in the domestic affairs of this Communist island in the Caribbean.

                  Despite the enthusiasm and goodwill that surrounded Sunday's game at the
                  packed 50,000-seat Estadio Latinoamericano, political relations between
                  Cuba and the United States are at their most antagonistic level in years.

                  President Clinton's decision in January to forgo a bipartisan commission to
                  review U.S.-Cuba policy and instead announce several measures intended
                  to ease the embargo's impact infuriated the Cuban government, which has
                  insisted the move was a ruse designed to undermine Castro's hold on
                  power and stanch widespread criticism of the punitive policy.

                  Consequently, the Castro regime cracked down on Cubans considered to
                  be U.S.-inspired political opponents, imposing prison sentences of up to
                  five years on four leading dissidents and establishing tough new penalties
                  for activities that can be construed as promoting U.S. policy objectives in
                  Cuba.

                  Havana's actions prompted condemnation not only from the United States,
                  but from many countries that have opposed isolating Cuba and are some of
                  its foremost economic partners, including Canada, Spain and Italy. The
                  15-member European Union recently criticized the sentencing of the four
                  dissidents as a violation of human rights and urged the Castro government
                  to release them promptly.

                  In Washington, State Department spokesman James P. Rubin said today
                  that Sunday's game "highlighted the goodwill of the American people
                  toward the Cuban people" and that, by being exposed not only to major
                  leaguers but to a game involving visiting American Little Leaguers, "the
                  Cuban people saw a fine example of American institutions, its values,
                  diversity and openness."

                  But far from assessing the game's impact on U.S. policy, Rubin instead
                  drew a laugh by telling reporters: "We are delighted about the way the
                  game was played." The Orioles eked out a 3-2 win in 11 innings.

                  The United States has said consistently that scheduling the baseball game in
                  Havana in no way reflected a change in policy toward the Castro
                  government, particularly in light of recent developments, but rather was
                  part of an effort by Washington to reach out to the Cuban people and
                  promote a more open society here.

                  "The ballgame was not at all meant to be a reward for [the government's]
                  behavior. There is no behavior to reward," a high-ranking U.S. State
                  Department official said before the game was played. "It is about taking the
                  people out of their isolation. Their isolation is not just political, it is cultural
                  and social. Baseball is a little window out of that isolation."

                  The official added: "Our relationship with the Cuban government is largely
                  dependent on its relationship with the Cuban people, and right now they
                  are treating their people terribly."

                  The State Department has said that the games with the Orioles are not the
                  equivalent of what came to be known as "Ping-Pong diplomacy," an
                  initiative of the early 1970s that helped open relations between the United
                  States and China.

                  Alarcon, too, said the Ping-Pong parallel was a false one. "They are
                  different games with different rules," he quipped.

                  But referring to the normalization of relations that followed that exchange
                  between the United States and China, Alarcon, departing from the harsh
                  anti-American rhetoric he has used during the past several months, said: "I
                  am sure something similar is going to happen with Cuba. . . . I don't know
                  when.

                  He added: "We are not opposed to a normal relationship. . . . We are
                  ready to wait whatever time is necessary. . . . But we will never accept
                  relations that are not based on mutual respect."

                           © Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company