CNN
February 4, 1999
 
 
Mexican Chief Backs Privatization of Power Industry

          By SAM DILLON

          MEXICO CITY -- Warning his compatriots that Mexico's energy needs are fast
          overwhelming its state-run power plants, President Ernesto Zedillo urged the nation's
          Congress on Wednesday to approve an extensive restructuring of the country's electric power
          industry, opening it to private investment.

          Zedillo proposed two constitutional reforms that would reverse Mexico's 1960 nationalization of the
          industry and allow private companies to invest in the leasing and construction of power plants and
          regional transmission lines. The national power grid and nuclear plants would remain under
          government control, officials said.

          Public ownership of energy industries has been a central tenet of Mexican nationalism, and Zedillo
          underlined the urgency of his proposals by announcing them in a nationwide television broadcast on
          Tuesday evening.

          Mexico needs to attract $25 billion in private investment to the electric power industry over the next
          six years, an amount equivalent to a quarter of the entire budget this year, the president said. That
          investment would allow Mexico to increase its generating capacity by 36 percent to keep up with the
          explosive demand for energy resulting from industrialization and population growth.

          "We have to do in a few years what before took decades," Zedillo said.

          Luis Tellez Kuenzler, the energy minister, said at a news conference Wednesday that "these reforms
          mean the total opening up of the sector to private investment."

          Private analysts agreed that Zedillo's proposals would, if approved, bring sweeping changes to the
          electricity industry. They could encourage dozens of U.S. and other foreign companies to make
          major investments, but how enthusiastically investors enter the market will depend on the clarity of
          the laws passed to permit the broader access, they said.

          Past government proposals to privatize parts of the petrochemical, natural gas and
          electricity-generating industries have been undermined by policy zigzags and contradictory official
          statements, they added.

          Limited changes to Mexico's energy laws passed in 1992 have allowed two major generating
          projects to date. One, the $647-million Samalayuca 2 generating plant near the border industrial city
          of Juarez and built by a consortium of U.S. and Mexican companies, went on line in August. The
          other, Merida 2, a $450-million plant in the Yucatan peninsula, is under construction.

          Despite numerous lengthy negotiations between the government and foreign energy companies, other
          projects have failed to go beyond the proposal stage, partly because the government still prohibits
          private companies from independently marketing the power they generate. Instead, the private
          companies have been obliged to sell their electricity to Mexico's sprawling government power utility,
          the Federal Electricity Commission. Zedillo's proposal would break that arrangement for the first
          time.

          "This is a big change," said George Baker, an independent consultant in Houston who studies the
          Mexican energy industry. "If they're changing the Constitution and allowing investors in a power plant
          to look for their own industrial customers, so they're not vulnerable to the whims that come with
          having only one buyer, then it will become a lot easier to attract financing."

          Michael T. Burr, editor of Independent Energy magazine, published in Tulsa, Okla., said the
          proposed changes would likely prove attractive to the 25 or so energy corporations in the world
          capable of building and operating major power plants. But he said that attracting $25 billion in six
          years is "really a lot."

          "It's about $4 billion per year, and that's pretty aggressive," Burr added. "It's tough to rally that kind
          of money. I'd be surprised if they can garner that kind of investment. I'd be awed."
 

                     Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company