A Sergeant Named Batista
Chapter 13
The
process of growing up in Cuba, particularly for those who hope to acquire an
education at the University of Havana, frequently creates serious problems for
the youngster, the parents, the government, and, in fact, for the Cuban people
in general. Admittedly a fine institution in many respects, the University of
Havana has for many years been the central point for inexcusable, outrageous
public disorders--disorders which would not be tolerated in any other university
in the world.
There
have been times when the two-hundred-year-old university's position as a center
of culture and high learning has been jeopardized by the misdeeds of some of
the students, who have tried to establish themselves as a special class, entirely
immune to the laws of the university, the laws of the nation, and the laws of
decent deportment.
Scholastic
routine has, in many cases and on many occasions, been subordinated to the
political finagling of immature youths who apparently have never beard of
discipline and show no respect for constituted authority either in or out of
the university. It is the unfortunate truth that in some sectors of the
university life the activities of the students have been more anarchic than
scholastic.
Certainly
during the early nineteen-thirties the students at the university devoted more
of their time and energy to political activities, which frequently were as
violent as they were useless, than they did to learning their lessons, and they
continued to contribute substantially to the political unrest in Cuba for the
next twenty years. It is true, perhaps, that only a relatively small number of
the more than fifteen thousand students enrolled at the university have been
responsible for most of the trouble, but the responsibility for the
traditionally bad conduct, practiced inside and outside the university, must be
shared by the whole student body.
When
students and faculty members, good or bad, allow their institution to become an
asylum for known gangsters, when they permit huge arsenals to be assembled and
stored in the university for revolutionary purposes, when they fail to prevent
the fabrication of murderous bombs in their chemical laboratories, the whole
university must take the responsibility.
For
a long while the public was willing to pass over these student incidents with a
sort of "boys-will-be-boys" attitude. But the people finally realized
that it is one thing to eat live goldfish or participate in panty raids, but
quite another to toss bombs, destroy public and private property, and shoot
policemen.
The
University of Havana, a government-supported institution, enjoys a greater
freedom of action than any university I've ever heard of, and it is this
freedom, or rather the abuse of it, which is responsible for most of the absurd
maliciousness which has been identified with university life for so many years.
Since
this freedom of action is responsible for the long, bad record of the
university, it might be well, at this point, to explain this unique arrangement
between government and university.
During
the regime of Machado, in the years prior to 1933, the students were an
important annoyance to the government. In the case of the student activities
against Machado it might be said that these militant youngsters contributed a
great deal toward the downfall of a tyrant. They did. A number of students were
assassinated by Machado gun men, and there is no reason to believe these
fighting youngsters were inspired by anything other than patriotism. University
students earned and were given a substantial share of the credit for the
ousting of Machado.
So
violent was the anti-Machado campaign at the university that be suspended all
scholastic activities at the institution for nearly three years. From Machado's
standpoint, this was a mistake, of course, because it solidified and
strengthened the student movement without achieving his purpose, which was to
destroy an important segment of the Machado opposition.
But
after Machado fell, on August 12, 1933, the students became a privileged class.
They swaggered through the streets of Havana wearing special arm bands
indicating that they were a kind of self-appointed police force, with the right
to make, interpret, enforce, or break laws in accordance with their own whims.
When Grau San Martin stepped into the Provisional Presidency in September,
1933, the students thought they bad inherited the earth. Grau, a university
professor himself, welcomed los muchachos into the government, and he humored,
pampered, and consulted with them on all his political moves. Perhaps this
adulation on the part of Grau distorted the students' appraisal of their own
political importance.
In
October, 1933, less than two months after the deposition of Machado, the Grau
government issued a decree-law recognizing the autonomy of the University of
Havana. There can be no doubt that the government's action was well
intentioned. Machado had interfered with even the simplest legitimate
scholastic affairs at the university, and in suspending classes he denied the
youth of Cuba the right to a university education. The Grau government's action
in recognizing the institution's right to autonomy was an attempt to prevent a
recurrence of the evils of a Machado. But from the day the university obtained
its autonomy, certain small but powerful groups of students have violated the
spirit of the whole arrangement. They have carried on campaigns of disorder and
they have participated in acts of terrorism. The unlawful and frequently
violent, if not actually traitorous, acts of these groups in 1935, hardly a
year from the day the university got its autonomy, made it necessary to suspend
the autonomy for a period of time. The Island of Cuba was passing through
another of its frequent political crises at the time, and there was real danger
of a general strike. The ruffian element among the university students became
more disorderly than ever, thereby aggravating an already turbulent situation.
When autonomy was suspended, and for months thereafter, only a few of the
university's normal functions were carried out. University life was almost at a
standstill.
In
1937, after a study of the university's problem, the Cuban Congress passed a
law re-establishing autonomy and modifying some of the rules and regulations at
the institution. The legislation established the rector as the head of the
university and created a University Council of thirty-nine members which, with
the rector, would serve as governing body. The same law set up a government
subsidy for the university which was fixed at two-and-a-quarter per cent of the
total amount of the nation's annual budget. The university was compelled to
account to the Minister of Education for the administration of this fund. There
have been a number of controversies over the budgetary appropriations to the
university. The University Council has, at times, claimed it never received the
full amount of the appropriation, while the Ministry of Education has stated
that the university failed properly to account for its expenditures.
There
have been several interpretations as to bow far the university's autonomy
extends, some of the university leaders insisting that the university is a kind
of separate state, with a status similar to that of the Vatican. The
university's autonomy was guaranteed and secured in the Cuban Constitution of
1940, and a university police force was established. University police are
responsible to the rector of the institution and they have no direct connection
with the other law enforcement groups in Cuba. Some of the university leaders
insist that no other law enforcement group has jurisdiction on university
property, but the law, as passed by Congress, specifies that when serious
alteration of public order occurs in the university, the autonomy can be suspended.
Once autonomy is suspended, members of the regular law enforcement groups, such
as the National Police and the Cuban Army, acquire jurisdiction over university
property as as well as university students. The idea, then, that the university
enjoys a status similar to that of the Vatican is a false one. It does not.
Another
troublemaker in the university setup is the loose restrictions on
matriculation. So inadequate are the entry requirements that it has been a
simple matter for gangsters, political agitators, especially Communists, and
all sorts of undesirable elements to enroll in the institution and get the
benefits of the immunities inherent in the semi-autonomous status of the
university. It has also allowed demagogic politicians to enroll and use the
university as a platform from which they could attack governments and
individuals without the danger of being called to account for what they said.
The laxity in entry requirements has, over the years, resulted in the
enrollment of a number of middle-aged "students" who have absolutely
no interest in scholastic achievements. It has been said, facetiously but
perhaps truthfully, that Havana University has the distinction of having more
baldheaded students than any university in the world.
University
officials have admitted that gangsters, Communists, and other varieties of
troublemakers use the university as a base of operations, but the university
people say, rather apathetically, that such activities only reflect the
troubled times through which Cuba has been passing.
The
situation at Havana University was best described in a series of articles in
the Havana newspaper Diario de la Marina, a thoroughly objective publication,
traditionally sympathetic to the university and its problems. The articles were
written early in 1953, when university students were on one of their customary
disorderly conduct sprees.
After
crediting the university with real achievements in certain fields, the writer
of the newspaper articles directed several questions to university authorities.
"What"
he asked, "has the University of Havana done with its absolute autonomy?
Who introduced the system of free matriculation which should never have
replaced the system of competitive registration, by which an underprivileged
student, who displayed outstanding ability, could enter the university? Who
converted the university campus into a separate republic, with the right to
stone omnibuses, annoy citizens, organize political meetings, and engage in
other activities completely foreign to normal university functions?
"University
autonomy," the writer warned, "cannot be utilized by anyone, whether
professor or student leader, to do within the university what the citizens
outside the university cannot do because such things are expressly forbidden by
the nation's laws."
But
regardless of the intent of the law which gave the university autonomy, it is
true that the institution has been a source of great annoyance to the people of
Cuba. The almost continuous bad conduct of its students, even though the number
of ruffians among them may be small, has seriously, and perhaps permanently,
damaged the prestige of Cuba's major institution of higher learning.
Furthermore, the scandalous antics of university students have added to the
woes of the Republic during one of the most difficult period of its young life.